Who is responsible for My Lai Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Who is responsible for My Lai - Essay Example Nonetheless, the nation was polarized and soon after he was celebrated in a patriotic pop song. President Richard Nixon, sometime later, ordered that he be transferred to a better and comfortable apartment under house arrest. Eventually, his sentence was reduced, and he served three years only. The fact that there were so many other people to hold responsible yet he was the only one convicted, however, elicits so many questions. Looking at the whole episode, even if they really should, it is unlikely that the American people stand in the larger dock of human conscience and guilt. Calley, on the other hand, had the responsibility to look after the civilians in Mr. Lai from the Vietcong not the one murdering them meaning that he was to blame. Upon realizing that the Vietcong had already retreated back into the mountains, it was prudent to have left the villagers alone to go about their daily lives. Secondly, there is evidence that Calley was responsible for the massacre. Pearson’s Keene et al textbook on page 800 In Competing Vision Given to Army investigators states that Calley said to Dennis Conti and to Private Paul Meadlo to â€Å"Take care of them†¦.I mean kill them† (Pearson 800) Wars are very expensive, not only economically, but they undermine the value of humanity. The massacre in Mr. Lai and that that World War II brought are examples that depict how inhuman people can sometimes be. The innumerable atrocities that were committed in Mr. Lai are in the slightest of sense related to the killing in world war. Killing innocent people, mothers, children, and infants in Mr. Lai was unwarranted. The causalities that result from World War II were

Globalization and Anti-Globalization Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Globalization and Anti-Globalization - Essay Example In its ambit, it includes the conception and development of statutory and institutional frameworks that should be able to capture and manifest the quintessence of what is meant by globalization. Globalization is a phenomenon that is not only expected to redefine the political and business priorities throughout the world, but is also expected to lead to a forging of the novel alliances amongst nations that are sans boundaries, cultural limitations and narrow visions (Zeiler: 4). At least this is what the champions of globalization prefer to maintain. The reactions manifested by the individuals and interest groups towards globalization can broadly be classified under three categories that is one who avidly support globalization, others who denounce globalization and the third who prefer to be fence sitters or to be apathetic. However, considering the unprecedented levels of importance of the issue under consideration, it raises many issues that sometimes border on the verge of conflict or contention. There is nothing wrong with it considering the fact that any major change in any vibrant society aught to be accompanied by much intense soul searching and pragmatic catechism. The supporters of globalization declare it to be a complex and synergistic process that is expected to bring in vast amounts of investments, expertise, technological know how and international backing to the third world nations (Anshuman 2006: 11). It is boasted to be a panacea that is expected to cure all the ills prevalent in the third world. Positively thinking, it may turn out to be so. However, on the other side there also exist a parallel and staunch anti-globalization lobby that is an amalgamation of many loose knit and scattered groups that owe allegiance to a plethora of race, gender, ethnicity and labour oriented issues (Epstein 2001: 3). Realistically speaking, globalization is a gargantuan phenomenon that happens to be much larger then individuals and groups. It is impossible for a ny individual or isolated group to grasp the implications of globalization at one go. Hence it becomes imperative to bite and digest this phenomenon in bits and pieces so as to get hold of its full potential. Despite all the aversions to this narrow approach, this calls for taking sides. Infact this is what this paper intends to do. 'The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and analyse globalization from the vantage point of an underdog and to interpret the possible implications and interpretation of globalization as an extension and perpetuation of the colonialist tendencies of the yore.'As already said that the paramount issue of globalization raises many throbbing issues and questions, it will be worthwhile to take a stock of these queries to get some insight into them. Will the advent and proliferation of globalization will give way to an internationally dominant class that will be in a position to perpetually exploit the